Blog Recent Articles
I love CERASMART for these applications. Here is a 20 year old who came in post ortho and post previous bonding that he had done when he was 14 year old. The bonding was starting to breakdown and I have no doubt it was because the spacing was so large. I hate to cut down teeth if I don't have to and wanted to be really conservative so I decided to so a prepless veneer.
Loving those thin margins!!!
(Inspired by Yao-Lin with my pictures. I still need practice!)
There are some compromises on a case like this but I can live with it. Yes, #9 is a little too wide compared to #8 but the space on the left side was a lot larger so I had to hide it somewhere. I don't love that the laterals are a little thick and facially inclined. I would have loved to tuck them back in lingually a touch, but with his bite on the left side this was tricky and again, without prepping for space it is what I gave up. adding some texture and composite colors really add some fun layers to these cases. He was really happy. His gums no longer bleed and they feel more stable to him. He was most excited with the fact that he didn't have to get numb!!!!
I had the opportunity to try out the .STL export function in software 4.5.
Under the export tab, I selected highest resolution.
From here, I imported the file into Meshmixer. A model .STL for CEREC chairside does not have a base, it's just a shell, so any holes in the model have to be closed and a base added... this is easily done in Meshmixer.
The .STL file is then imported into Preform software for adding supports and printing.
Technically, you should use Dental Model resin to print these, but I had gray already loaded and wasn't concerned about checking the margin accuracy as I wanted the model only to help with contouring.
It's really a bigger advantage then I realized to be able to look at the incisal edges and contours on a model. People like Kris and Ross can do this stuff with their eyes closed, but I need every bit of help I can get.
Immediate post op. Pt. was happy and I had much less intra oral adjusting to do.
About to print my first 3D STL guide using formlabs 2. I have imported it and extruded it using videos that Mike posted to be able to print vertically. I noticed that when I imported the file into preform, even before extruding (so the original .stl given by lab), that this warning popped up - "Some loaded models are damaged and need repair." Should I ask preform to repair or to leave it alone? And what does this mean? Thanks for information.
I just wanted to show a case that just got seated today. It was a bridge from 2=5. I would have preferred implants obviously, but the patient did not want to do the required grafting, etc... to do it. She was rather concerned about esthetics... so what do we do? I don't use e.max bridges in the posterior anymore and the high strength zirconia would have not looked good enough. I could have sent to the lab for a layered bridge... but I tried to use translucent zirconia instead. I have talked extensively about the short comings of this material. Even though the flexural strength of this material I used is 600mpa, there is no transfomational toughening present so it is much weaker than the zirconia that we all use same day. This is Copran Ultra Translucent zirconia from Empire Dental Solutions.
The result was excellent... will it work long term? We will see. The connectors were about 14mm2 on this and it was cemented. I fired it for 9 hours in the S1 furnace (cannot use Speedfire for this).
Just thought I would post as an option.
The following patient was dissatisfied with her previous cosmetic result delivered elsewhere, so we literally went back to the digital drawing board to re-design her smile. One of the most impactful concepts we teach at Spear Education is understanding that a smile usually consists of more than just a couple restorations. We use templates and mock-ups to demonstrate to the patient the potential solutions to his/her concerns, to help him/her understand what is possible, to set realistic expectations of the outcome, and, of course, to guide our Cerec design.
Good morning everyone,
Having a pediatric dentist working side by side in our office allows me to see and treat cases that can be somewhat challenging. This young man (14 years young) presented this morning having taken an elbow to the mouth during a basketball game. He indicated that the tooth was loose but was not having any pain. As you can see by the attached radiograph, we have a serious root fracture. I am also attaching a photo of his current occlusion, which also is mess at this time. . Today, we splinted the teeth together so the patient would not lose the coronal portion of his tooth, as we work on his treatment options. Our ultimate goal is to preserve his ridge as best as possible for future implant placement. Our initial thought is to endo the remaining apical root to keep this asymptomatic and preserve the ridge until he is old enough for implant placement. We feel there is not enough apical root left to extrude and support a crown restoration. If we extract everything, our concerns are loss of supportive bone levels, considering he wont be a candidate for implant therapy for quite sometime.
If someone has other options, would be great to hear them.
I saw a comment on the boards the other day that asked this question. It was funny because I am going through a case right now that I had some issues with this.
I don't exactly know how to answer the question to be honest. There are many different things i've heard.... things like the blanching goes away in 20 min or less,etc... The way that I have done it in the past was just by "feel". That is... I want to put pressure on the tissue and I can usually feel if it's too much by how it seats. If I have trouble, then I will adjust. It also will depend on anterior vs posterior and how much tissue I need to move.
Here is a case replacing 2 congenitally missing lateral incisors. He has been wearing a flipper for over 10 years and finally wanted some teeth. Here is the initial preop photo...
After doing the plan, we placed the implants guided in the site
I let heal about 3 months. Since he had a flipper, I just used healing caps that were flush with the tissue and adjusted his flipper for the provisional.
Here is how the tissue looked at full healing:
As you can see, I have a lot of tissue to move, especially on tooth #10. Now, here is the mistake that I made. I tried to move it too quickly. Meaning, I pushed on the tissue way way too hard. It was difficult and painful for the patient (I did not numb up). #7 was still painful, but not that bad because I didn't have to go as far...
Here are the initial provisionals:
How do I know I pushed too much too fast? Here is an iphone picture my assistant sent me two days later (it's her brother in law)
Yikes.... I had to have the patient in immediately, get the provisional out, recontour it quite a bit and put it back in. That with a chlorohexidine rinse healed the problem in about 4 days.... Here he is as of Monday:
So.. be careful. If you need to move the tissue a lot, do it in a couple stages and not all at once. You may get lucky and it will work... or you may end up having a significant issue like I did on this case.
Just another case with another custom healing abutment. It is aour standard protocol now in most cases. I am doing a presentation this week so I figured I would post this. The final crown was made from the initial scan at the time of surgery. I literally removed the healing abutment and placed the crown. Also the bone was profiled at the time of surgery
Comparison of the gingival 1/3 of the custom healing abutment and final crown
I think there is definitely a case to be made for some sort of study on this. How much is too much, how much is too little and what is just right for each different clinical scenario.
While we strive to be complete in our care, we also want to be efficient. These are just questions that come to mind that I would love answered.
I had my Form 2 printer delivered last week and it's been so much fun playing with it. This patient presented with fractured teeth @ #20 and #21 with missing 18,19. We decided on a plan to extract the roots 20 and 21, place implants @ #19 & #21 and make a 3 unit bridge. In the past, I would have sent for a Sicat guide or made 2 CG2's, but I want to go over the workflow for a printed guide since I have a new toy.
First, the patient (or a model in this case) is scanned with CEREC and a bridge designed so that I can incorporate my plan into Galaxis with one .ssi file.
The implants are planned in the usual way, including setting D2 and choosing a CG2 sleeve. The CMG.DXD file is then exported in the same way as you would for milling a guide. Since I don't have inlab, I sent this file via dropbox to Frankie at AA Dental and in a day, he converted my file to a .STL file.
In the preform software that comes with the printer, I was able to add supports so that it prints properly (these can be edited away from critical areas).
Once the supports are removes (kind like the sprues on a milled guide), the guide was tried on the model. It really is very easy to remove them.
This entire process took a day and cost about $20 for the stl conversion and about $7 in material. Just another option with a pretty easy workflow. It's also fun to play with!